logo

Know whether your Microsoft SOC can detect, investigate, and respond to the attack that matters

A modern SOC earns its value when it detects, investigates, and contains real attacks before they become business events. Yet in many organizations, true detection and response readiness is unclear. Detections fire, investigations happen, and coverage exists, but leadership still cannot answer with confidence whether the SOC would perform when tested.
Schedule a scoping call

What is at stake

When leadership asks, “Are we ready to detect and respond to a serious incident?” the answer should be evidence based, not inferred from alert volume, recent experience, or what appears to be configured. The wrong time to discover a readiness gap is during the incident that tests it.

Detection and response readiness is difficult to assess because it is distributed across tools, workflows, data quality, analyst behavior, response authority, and operational habits that never appear in a single dashboard. This Sprint produces the evidence needed to answer foundational readiness questions with confidence.

  • check mark icon
    Detection coverage exists, but gaps are not mapped against the threats that matter most
  • check mark icon
    Alerts fire, but signal quality, context, and next steps are inconsistent
  • check mark icon
    Data and telemetry issues quietly degrade detection effectiveness over time
  • check mark icon
    Investigation and response workflows rely on tribal knowledge rather than repeatable patterns
  • check mark icon
    SOC reporting emphasizes activity, not effectiveness
  • check mark icon
    Leadership lacks a defensible readiness position for audits, boards, or planning

    • Why SOC readiness is difficult to answer with confidence

    Detection effectiveness

    Coverage exists, but it may not align to the threat paths that matter most in your environment. Rules fire, but low fidelity, weak context, or unclear next steps can turn detection value into noise.

    Data quality and coverage integrity

    Critical telemetry may be missing, delayed, or incomplete even when connectors appear enabled. Detections quietly stop working without clear visibility into why.

    Workflow consistency and response feasibility

    Investigations and outcomes vary by workflow, shift, or analyst, while response actions can fail under real-world constraints such as missing permissions, unclear authority, or incomplete integration.

    Analyst capacity and operational leverage

    Manual correlation, limited automation, and insufficient grounding for Security Copilot reduce analyst effectiveness and make readiness difficult to scale or measure.
    How the Assessment runs

    A defensible way to assess SOC readiness

    The SOC Readiness Assessment Sprint follows a focused, evidence-driven approach to determine what is actually working today, not just what appears configured on paper. Each step builds toward a defensible readiness position your team can act on.

    What you recieve.

    At the conclusion of the Sprint, you have a clear, evidence-based view of SOC readiness, a prioritized plan to improve it, and a leadership-ready explanation of what should happen next.

  • check mark icon
    SOC readiness findings with severity, operational impact, and remediation guidance
  • check mark icon
    A detection coverage map aligned to relevant MITRE ATT&CK techniques and the threats most important to your environment
  • check mark icon
    A workflow and analyst experience summary showing how investigations actually run today
  • check mark icon
    A target-state readiness roadmap sequenced by detection value, effort, and analyst capacity impact
  • check mark icon
    A leadership-ready summary suitable for executives, auditors, and planning stakeholders

    • What comes after?

    The Sprint produces clarity and a roadmap. Execution of that roadmap is a separate decision.

    Depending on what the Sprint uncovers, the next step typically falls into one of three paths: focused remediation through an Accelerator, broader capability buildout through a Modern SOC Deployment, or ongoing improvement through a Modern SecOps Optimize engagement.

    Whether execution continues with LockBase or your internal team, the value of the Sprint is a defensible plan and the ability to act on it.

    cogbookuserschevron-downlayers